Category: Uncategorized

**Update – Even after a month of receiving a letter from Mumbai GPO dated 29th June’ 2012 , mentioning the refund over delay is sanctioned. Also, Asst. Director Mr. Patel has verbally assured Detailed inquiry” -Have not received even refund, or any update on inquiry**

Until 16^th of May’ 2012, almost all Indians, were sure that Central Government’s Ministry of Human Resource Department and Ministry of Finance is located in New Delhi, except for Indian Postal Office, who begin their search for above mentioned ministries from as far as at Kolkata, then Dhanbad and from Dhanbad went to Ranchi and then at Noida (Palam), despite being tired by long journey, Indian Postal service kept their search on to locate the ministry, and finally found the location of Ministry in New Delhi, mysteriously the location was same to that of pre 16^th May’ 2012 location and as mentioned in the Parcel. Confused? Please don’t be. This is the story about my RTI application journey.

 Premise: I have filed two RTI applications, one to Ministry of Finance and another to Ministry of HRD, The two RTI were duly written, attached Rs.10 stamp, mentioned name of concerned person in the ministry, whom the RTI was to be addressed and also the postal address of the Ministry on the envelope. Later the application were dispatched via Speed Post from Mumbai G.P.O, on 16^th May’ 2012 at 12.15PM, and the receipt clearly identifies the recipient to be in New Delhi (below is the copy of speed post receipt)

Now in normal eventuality, since the service chosen was speed post, the parcel should have reached to both the ministries either by 17^th May or latest on 18^th May’ 2012. However surprisingly, Indian postal service decided to sent my application only on 17^th May’ 2012 2.23AM but to Dhanbad (Mistake no.1). The application was received at Kolkata on 17^th May’2012 2.01PM. The game actually begins now, Kolkata postal department at Airport on receipt of the parcel should have dispatched back to New Delhi. But let’s give them the discount, that the entire lot was not individually checked at Kolkata airport (Ideally the lot should be checked, to avoid such eventuality, which can possibly cause huge loss to the sender, by the mistake of postal department, hence Mistake No. 2). Dhanbad receives my application on 18^th May’ 2012 0.41AM, from Dhanbad the applications goes to Ranchi on 18^th May’ 2012 at 4.48AM (Mistake no.3, instead of sending back to Kolkata it is been send further to Ranchi), the application reaches Raanchi on 19^th May’ 2012 at 5.55AM, then from Ranchi it goes to Noida (Palam TMO) on 19^th May’ 2012 at 6.09AM and The Noida Palam TMO receives on 19^th May’ 2012 at 8.46PM and the application is dispatched for Delhi GPO on 19^th May’ 2012 at 9.09PM. Finally application reached to New Delhi GPO, on 21^st may’ 2012 at 7.01AM, after 5 days of sending via SPEED POST and after my application doing half of unnecessary Bharat Darshan. The details of the journey undertaken by RTI application (even though forcefully) is shown below

 

The above mentioned case, is not simple case of Human error by employee in Indian Postal office, as mistake can be done once, but not repeatedly by bunch of employees in consecutive manner – if one of the two application was sent in wrong lot, then this act can be given benefit of doubt (yet not pardonable, since it is lapse in service despite charging premium). However both the application were repeatedly been packed in wrong Lot and this despite the envelope mentioned RTI on top and eligible address mentioned on cover, and top of it the system of Indian Postal department has recorded Delhi as the destination. Now, can Postal department explain, why the sender was not informed about this mishap and once the parcel reached to Kolkata, why was application not resend to New Delhi? The parcel from Kolkata to Dhanbad was received in approximately 8 hours and 40 minutes, so after Dhanbad postal department found out that two of the parcel meant for Delhi parcel is with them, why were the applications not send back to Kolkata and instead send to Ranchi, from there the applications were routed to Noida and finally at Delhi, taking approximately 3 days? Can Postal Department explain the logic of not utilizing the route of 8 hours and 40 minutes and instead chose the route via Ranchi / Nodia, which took over 3 days? The parcel was opened and checked at every destination except for Kolkata, Only if Kolkata department had checked the matter would have been resolved.

 

I may be accused of being paranoid or cynic but Mr. Kapil Sibal under whose ministry functions the Postal department of India, is highly active in attempts to suppress the freedom of expression and furthering the cause of faulty RTE and again labeling the loss in 2G scam as Zero, has no time to check about the gross mis-functionality in postal department. My allegations may be wrong, but with the paranoia clinged up in UPA government due to continuous exposure of its inefficiency through RTI and other institutions like CAG etc. Though very dim possibility but it can’t be ignored, certain RTI are being deliberately delayed or attempted to be lost, not to forget my RTI was for one of the ministry held by Kapil Sibal.

 

The complaint to the Postal Department has to no help, the only reply i received for my e-complaint was, since parcel has received to Delhi, should close the matter.

However, I would like to Tk to Mid-Day team, especially Mr. Shahshank Rao and Sachin Kalbag, for assisting me in telling my story to people at large. below is the story in Mid Day, Dated 25th May’ 2012

– URL of Mid – Day article

 

 

After the above story in media, The Postal Department has contacted me, and assured of the inquiry and also ordered for refund to me for the delay. Any further info on inquiry will be updated in the blog. Thanks to Mid-Day, for their assistance getting reply from Postal Department

It is really funny that even a post from speed post department from GPO with in same city, does not got delivered for more than 25 days, despite repeated assurance from Additional. Director Mr. Patel. Below is the letter received from GPO

 

Today’s Abhishek Manu Singhvi’s latest jibe on Social media in attempt to save himself, has actually pushed me to write this blog.

 

The CD  started doing rounds of Abhishek Manu Singvi enjoying his act with Certain Lady Lawyer, whose name was doing rounds to be Judge in 2010/11, however CJI. Kapadia had returned the recommendation on her name along with four other lawyers for reconsideration.

The argument doing round of privacy is so nauseating and irritating, all the more when yesterday we saw the “inventor” of dubious and farce sting operations in name of Journalism, would write over the moral ramifications of Sting expose.

Hypothetically, had CD shown AMS accepting cash for some professional favour, would Media have asked the legality of the video recording or would they have demanded for restrain, considering it is private chamber and AMS has its right to privacy? Now, supposedly instead of cash, when someone asks for sex in lieu of professional favour, suddenly Media proclaims “PRIVACY”. How hypocritical!!!

The quid pro quo is yet to be established and hence one cant out rightly blame AMS for the same but, in past Media would draw orgasmic pleasure by exposing exchange of cash if caught on camera, has media ever shown restraint until the premise of exchange is established and proven? No, it’s consider to corruption, so applying same assumption in this case, is only fair, with sources saying quid pro quo discussion is recorded needs to verified.

 

SPOT THE DIFFERENCE between the above picture and the one which was widely distributed having Singvi in action with his kurta UP-  The difference is NOT IN THE ACTION, BUT IN WAY OF CAPTURING THE ACT

Now going by the privacy infringement argument, even the BJP MLA (Karnataka) privacy was infringed by Camera Man by peeping in to MLA’s mobile without any authorisation, how different it is than the recording of AMS act behind closed doors? Not one media had shown any restrained or respected privacy of BJP MLA. In fact, there were hour’s long debates on the issue in almost all media channels and pages of articles in print media, where expert dished out their version of assembly morality.

The Media trial case on BJP MLA (Karnataka) was plainly on moral grounds, no legal case was involved. Heads of BJP MLA was demanded by Media, CONG and self proclaimed experts ONLY and ONLY on high moral grounds attached to assembly functioning, without once discussing that was camera men was within his rights to peep into some one’s mobile without permission. At that time the process and manner used / applied to expose BJP MLA received sanctity and security, the technology was praised to able to catch such an immoral act. The case of Gujarat MLA, has beyond doubt been proven a farce acted by stooge of Mr. Shanker Singh Vagela (CONG leader).

 

BJP Keeping its high moral standards, and not indulging into technical / legal aspect of the method of expose, suspended the MLA who were ACUSSED of watching porn in assembly, even when camera man had infringed privacy of BJP MLA. But BJP understood importance of high moral Standards; it acted in the right manner, Also not once the BJP has questioned the right of Camera MAN to peep in to mobile without permission. I am no legal expert, but just as Singhvi racks up the legal issue of privacy, the camera man could have been tried for infringement, ONLY if BJP’s intention were to cover u p or hush up the matter. Instead, BJP didn’t touch that matter as far as camera man helped in notifying misconduct. And BJP was right in doing so.
In case of Abhishek Manu Singhvi, he is both legally and morally culpable, legally as there is allegation of quid pro quo (needs to be proven, officially). And as far as Moral ground is concerned, Singhvi is 100000% more culpable then BJP MLA who were been caught watching porn (in the same manner AMS was caught when he was without his pants). Now it’s only wise, that the CD be sent to forensic laboratory, and get the authenticity of the CD and the possible quid pro quo arrangement. Till then on moral grounds, Singhvi has to be suspended from Rajya Sabha and all constitutional positions he is handling.

I would like to re-emphasise and sorry for it but – For beyond doubt it is proved the process and method applied in catching BJP MLA watching porn is more than similar of exposing colorful and possibly corrupt side of Singhvi .. So media and congress will do better by not bringing misleading argument of privacy infringement. And better ask CONG to act on moral grounds and then legally.

 

The case of sting operation and privacy trespassing is a serious issue, which we as society has to ponder over, but that should be taken  up some other time, may be after Singhvi saga, with fresh mind, for the sting operation, if used for revenge and scoring political points, will lead to unnecessary chaos, but that discussion, would be some other time, right now its only fait to solve the chaos and the case around Singhvi.

P.S – I in no manner have attempted or wished to defend the porn watching of BJP MLA. to me it has been wrong then, when caught and even now. The case only used to draw analogy and explain my case of larger culpability of Singhvi. Thanks

 

Fav Song  by Abhishek Manu Singhvi: It Wasnt Me – SHAGGY

 

CoNG and Media Discussing with Abhishek Manu Singhvi –Dheere Dheere Bol Koi Sunna Ke