Demonetizaton – Disruption in Economics!!

The business transactions in India, be it large corporate or small retail – household transactions, has undergone a see change since 8th Nov’ 2016, when elected government of India, took a disruptive decision of demonetization, where currency notes of Rs500 and Rs1000 are rendered as illegal tender with immediate effect. The reason cited for the decision ranged from curbing corruption to fighting the terrorism, which thrives on counterfeit currency.

The move has changed the perspective and way business is conducted, from being 98% cash transacting economy, India is seeing quick rise in online and cashless transaction and small traders are quickest to adapt this new change to sustain their business. Whether the move is success of failure on economical front, can’t be predicted now and will be known after at least one financial quarter, however, the cascading effects on behavioral pattern are already seen, and it has been encouraging. With most of the currency printed getting accounted in the system, provides impetus in planning the future course of the economic development.

Also, demonetization has unleashed an opportunity of level playing ground among the citizens, with unaccounted / black money being illegal now, it will now be difficult to use the black money, by way of bribe to influence a decision be it government or corporate. Though it is difficult to predict corruption will end through this move, what we can be confident about is, the changing mindset of citizens, towards being accountable and responsible in the way they conduct themselves economically, which certainly was possible only thru disruption, like demonetization; and not my sermons or warning.

6Th December ~ Date that exposed contradiction and Hypocrisy of LEFT…!!!


A disputed site, named #BabriMasjid was demolished on 6th December’ 1992 illegally (technically, as there was legal order to bring down the structure or the one who demolished were not assigned to do so, by book of law of the country). However, illegality of the demolition, should not dilute the fact, disputed structure alleged as masjid was constructed over remains of temple, which is well documented not only the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report; but also in the Allahabad Court Judgment.

ayodhyaI am avoiding *Cause-Effect* analogy, for demolition took place illegally as Judgment and Polity played to gallery of pseudo minoritarian secular vote bank politics, where facts were ignored only for appeasement. The cause-effect analogy is avoided, only to expose flaw on pseudo seculars argument, who are of view – Riots happened & people killed, also some temples burnt down ONLY because of #BabriDemolition. Since, the other cause effect analogy when brought in fore, shows, Babri was demolished because, politics avoided bringing rightful solution and justice. The circle of cause-effect will end at source of all riots and babri demolition, was ONLY due to destruction of Ram Mandir by Islamist invader. Also, cause-effect analogy doesn’t exonerate a crime, be it before or after the event; just as babri demolition can’t exonerate the riots. All crimes are to be exclusively examined and treated to; illegal demolition of disputed structure Babri Masjid be taken to its logical conclusion; and

Also, destruction of Ram Mandir should not be ignored, and due justice be delivered.

However, the pseudo seculars, not only ignore the history, while crying for Babri masjid demolition, as destruction of Edifice of Secularism, but also have self-exposed their hypocrisy through conspicuous silence over demolition of over hundreds and thousands of temple (not just in history) but in contemporary, more so after #BabriDemolition. If Babri Demolition was assault on Indian fabric; why pin drop silence on thousands of temple demolished; and even now idols are continuously desecrated by a specific minority community.   The evil design of Left historians is exposed by Former regional head of ASI, Dr KK Muhammed, in his book – Njan Enna Bharatiyan (I an Indian) in Malayalam (Details here),

In words of Dr. KK Muhammed, “The Babri issue would have been settled long ago if the Muslim intelligentsia had not fallen prey to the brain washing by the Leftist historians. A set of historians including Romila Thapar, Bipin Chandra and S Gopal argued that there was no mention of the dismantling of the temple before 19th century and Ayodhya is Bhudhist-Jain centre. They were supported by historians Irfan Habib,RS Sharma, DN Jha, Suraj Ben and Akthar Ali, It was they who connived with the extremist Muslim groups to derail all attempts to find an amicable solution to the Masjid issue. Some of them even took part in several government-level meetings and supported the Babri Masjid Action Committee,” …. “We found not one but 14 pillars of a temple at the Babri Masjid site. All these pillars had domes carved on them. The domes resembled those found in temples belonging to 11th and 12th century. In the temple architecture domes are one of the nine symbols of prosperity. It was quite evident that the Masjid was erected on the debris of a temple. I went on writing to several English dailies in those days about the finding. Only one news paper published my view and that too in the letters to Editor column.

In the backdrop of ASI report, that Ram Mandir was grazed down only to construct Babri Masjid, I support and am of the view, Ram Mandir be built on the same very place, where temple was demolished by invader and subsequent Islamist ruler; even while certainly not of the view, that demolition of the Masjid was the ONLY alternative. The case is not as much of faith, as much it is of legal title and facts; Ram lalla (Shri Ram) is found to be legal heir of the Ayodhya land, through documentation and also ASI reports mentions, Temple remains and pillars were found beneath Babri masjid, which only suggests, there was a Temple, which was demolished to build a Masjid illegally.  I look forward to early Court verdict keeping in view of Allahabad Judgment based of factual ASI reports; and that’s justice is not held hostage to minority appeasement, with this I also assert, as a Hindu and also Indian, we shall accept the judgment delivered by highest court of the country (after utilizing all the opportunity at the disposal). Also, as conciliatory gesture, a structure bearing name Babri Masjid can/should be allowed at some distance away from Ayodhya, the Ram Janmabhoomi.

Only if  polity earlier (and even now), would have stood behind what is right and facts presented, and requested for quick delivery justice, may be Babri Demolition (illegally) wouldnt have happened, and legal solution for creation of Ram Mandir could have been sought; also unfortunate riots killing many people would also have been avoided. Anyways, its late; but I still hope course correction happens soon. Also, The possibility of riots by miscreants, should also not deter away from delivering justice based on facts, anyone indulging in riots be punished, without discrimination.

Demand for Ram Mandir also has its bearing, for being Ancient Indian Cultural Heritage. The decline of society in its value and also in its existence happens, when the history is insulted and not preserved;  Whatever be the faith; FACTS cant be ignored, and Fact remains, there was a Temple which was broken down; thus it has to be restored; and also semtiments of minority can be respected by not robbing away the structure of Babri Masjid, just at some distance, which is also suggested by Allahbad High court in its judgment.