Supreme Court and its fallacy in understanding the Hindu epic

My blog in response to Supreme Court’s Observation that, Dhronacharya committed injustice on Eklavya, because he was tribal (


While I am no scholar in scriptures, my knowledge to the epic is courtesy to the explanation provided by mom and grand mom in my early years and even now.

Its really saddening to see that mocking hindu religion, its scriptures and epics is the fashion across the society. Politician’s always used and mocked religions for their vested interest. Left liberal are better not talked about. Media is at best left out from this discussion, as for their petty benefits and to please their masters, journalist have gone to extent of calling Lord Rama as divine encroacher. I am pained to see the one of most trusted wing of democracy, Judiciary have started making statements on individual faith without understanding the matter.

The observation that “Dhronacharya had committed injustice on Eklavya by seeking right thumb of Eklavya, so as to benefit Arjuna” is highly misplaced and motivated. Firstly we must understand the respect that is been showered to shree Dhronacharya by Indians as a whole lot and not just Hindus. Dhronacharya award for coaches / teachers in field of sport is considered to be the top most award in the flurry of Bhart ratna’s and Padma shree’s (whose sanctity has been lost courtesy past few winners).

Now coming back to the topic of Dhronacharya and Eklavya, let me try and solve the mystery as I understand. The reason for seeking thumb of Eklavya by Dhronacharya was not because of love for Arjuna. The underline message of Dhronacharya was, Knowledge is the wealthiest treasure and no one can acquire it by stealing and/or without sacrificing. It is fact that Eklavya learnt the art of archery from Dhronacharya without the consent of the teacher. Dhronacharya wanted to instill the importance of the teacher and understanding that wealth of knowledge cannot be stolen but acquired after consent of the giver and also after sacrificing something to acquire that wealth. Hence to give lesson to generations ahead and to avoid misleading of students, Dhronacharya took this decision

The wealth acquired after hard work sacrificed is cherished and respected. Without the step of Dhronacharya to invoke discipline in students, respect to the teachings and teachers would have been far-fetched dream. The student is been endeavored with a heavy responsibility of being disciplined. Knowledge is treated as blessing of GOD, and stealing of this blessing does invite the wrath. However, I would also like to mention that the above statements in no way demean the passion of young student named Eklavya who wanted to learn the art.

The passion of Eklavya has been guiding light for many students and it has to be used as zeal to learn. However any good intent, passion performed beyond the frame work of discipline has to be restricted. The zeal of Eklavya was not off ill intent or to cheat, but the Decision of Dhronacharya had nothing to do with the caste of Eklavya. Yes caste of Eklavya was reason for not letting him inside the guru ashram meant for royal children, which can debatable, but only after studying in depth the reason for it. The zeal of one person can not be used as proof to demean other person’s righteous act.

Superficial reading and commenting on scriptures is STOOPID and not required from any quarters of society. The Supreme court is highly respected and looked institution in India, and hence it has added responsibility to act in the similar fashion and casual and not thought out remark can and shall have repercussions beyond the control of law and create distress among the people who feel that judiciary is only their last recourse after politicians, media and police have failed them. Hence it is my personal request that Supreme Court should desist in remarking on faith without complete knowledge on the subject matter I hope my this tiny understanding of our scriptures can throw light and pave way to pseudo sickular to mend their ways of mocking one of the biggest gift to the world, Sanatan Dharma

Where are We Headed by UPA and ANNA

The Difference between Aberration and Routine is Not understood, and that is main problem for INDIA in name of ANNA and UPA

1. No doubt, UPA with its arrogance, apathy and massive corruption, is much of abnormal entity in Indian system ~ kind of curse

2. This abnormal pain did required, extra measures, to solve issue outside ambit if Normalcy – and thats where First came in Baba Ramdev and then ANNA with his troop of leftist and NGO

ABNORMAL SITUATION AT TIMES NEED SPECIAL TREATMENT – UPA attracted this protest from public and protest is Justified – But wait its not the end.

3. UPA is NOT eternal, its a situational winner and hence to solve the treatment (ANNA led protest) has to be aberration and not daily dosage of medicine for life time to INDIA

4. Need to create system not with backdrop of specific situation but with backdrop of cluster of permutation and Combination

Eg – Whether PM should b under of ambit or not, should not be discussed keeping Man Mohan Singh in mind, but it should be discussed keeping in mind the Chair of PM and its rights and Duties, and future consequence. For PM Chair will always remain but not MMS

5. Same thing goes for Pro-ANNA, the current govt is thief / dacoit / brutal curse on INDIA – bt again UPA is not eternal reality hence Respect Parliament and Democracy.

Agreed Lokpal bill needed awakening done by BABA Ramdev and ANNA, all respect to BABA. but it ends very much there, let strong lokpal bill be tabled (already done by BJP as private member bill)

Now awakened society has to do job of vigil observer and not take role of interfering agent with rigidity

6. Also expecting now all reform law to b passed by such pressure is wrong, not that people dont have right, citizens are supreme – however its the citizens who have chosen representative to make law, so either replace inefficient representative

7. Such a mass awakening need not be ridiculed, it represent people’s anger toward oppressive government, however This has to be stopped once the process has started and let the democratic process start to overhaul this government who has thrusted anger dissatisfaction amongst its people.

LASTLY, just because ANNA got support for the cause against corruption, the support should not be misused for other agenda’s – Instead the strength and importance of parliament should be explained rather than ridiculing system. ANNA should explain the importance of political process, right as citizens – and warn not just cong but all the parties in politics that if they will be corrupt, such protest is in store, however – such protest is to b last resort and not the first. UPA’s apathy deserved this protest but not every future parliament needs this, let parliament be allowed to work in ambit of constitution in favor of people, While Anna can teach people how to be vigil and aware observant over government instead of interfering in govt at drop of h at