Featured Posts

Rituals r they burden, or means for coherent society ... Yesterday, came across an article, where an progressive lady sarpanch of 1 Indian village called for ending Mrtiyu Bhoj (feast given to relatives post death of family member) citing it acts as burden of poor people who cant afford it.   Which...

Read more

Demonetizaton – Disruption in Economics!! The business transactions in India, be it large corporate or small retail – household transactions, has undergone a see change since 8th Nov’ 2016, when elected government of India, took a disruptive decision of demonetization, where currency notes...

Read more

Is the situation in India not conducive for differently-abled people? Recently, a news report said that a differently abled person complained of being embarrassed by airport authorities when she was forced to take off her prosthetic leg and pass it through the luggage scanner along with other passengers’ baggage. She...

Read more

Need for Media Regulator To the Prime Minister of India, Subject – Request for Independent Regulator for News Media   Adarneeye Pradhan Mantriji This request is not for imposing censorship on media, but ensuring accountability, verifiable & authentic news...

Read more

Media, System and Society The Lack of "Must be Routine", compels incompetent to LOUDLY praise even the pretentious intent of performing 'What is to be done". This urge is more to do with white-washing the in-efficiencies and NOT to find a solution to cure the rot. - is the conclusion...

Read more

Subscribe by email

6Th December ~ Date that exposed contradiction and Hypocrisy of LEFT…!!!

Category : Indian Politics, Politics

 

A disputed site, named #BabriMasjid was demolished on 6th December’ 1992 illegally (technically, as there was legal order to bring down the structure or the one who demolished were not assigned to do so, by book of law of the country). However, illegality of the demolition, should not dilute the fact, disputed structure alleged as masjid was constructed over remains of temple, which is well documented not only the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report; but also in the Allahabad Court Judgment.

ayodhyaI am avoiding *Cause-Effect* analogy, for demolition took place illegally as Judgment and Polity played to gallery of pseudo minoritarian secular vote bank politics, where facts were ignored only for appeasement. The cause-effect analogy is avoided, only to expose flaw on pseudo seculars argument, who are of view – Riots happened & people killed, also some temples burnt down ONLY because of #BabriDemolition. Since, the other cause effect analogy when brought in fore, shows, Babri was demolished because, politics avoided bringing rightful solution and justice. The circle of cause-effect will end at source of all riots and babri demolition, was ONLY due to destruction of Ram Mandir by Islamist invader. Also, cause-effect analogy doesn’t exonerate a crime, be it before or after the event; just as babri demolition can’t exonerate the riots. All crimes are to be exclusively examined and treated to; illegal demolition of disputed structure Babri Masjid be taken to its logical conclusion; and

Also, destruction of Ram Mandir should not be ignored, and due justice be delivered.

However, the pseudo seculars, not only ignore the history, while crying for Babri masjid demolition, as destruction of Edifice of Secularism, but also have self-exposed their hypocrisy through conspicuous silence over demolition of over hundreds and thousands of temple (not just in history) but in contemporary, more so after #BabriDemolition. If Babri Demolition was assault on Indian fabric; why pin drop silence on thousands of temple demolished; and even now idols are continuously desecrated by a specific minority community.   The evil design of Left historians is exposed by Former regional head of ASI, Dr KK Muhammed, in his book – Njan Enna Bharatiyan (I an Indian) in Malayalam (Details here),

In words of Dr. KK Muhammed, “The Babri issue would have been settled long ago if the Muslim intelligentsia had not fallen prey to the brain washing by the Leftist historians. A set of historians including Romila Thapar, Bipin Chandra and S Gopal argued that there was no mention of the dismantling of the temple before 19th century and Ayodhya is Bhudhist-Jain centre. They were supported by historians Irfan Habib,RS Sharma, DN Jha, Suraj Ben and Akthar Ali, It was they who connived with the extremist Muslim groups to derail all attempts to find an amicable solution to the Masjid issue. Some of them even took part in several government-level meetings and supported the Babri Masjid Action Committee,” …. “We found not one but 14 pillars of a temple at the Babri Masjid site. All these pillars had domes carved on them. The domes resembled those found in temples belonging to 11th and 12th century. In the temple architecture domes are one of the nine symbols of prosperity. It was quite evident that the Masjid was erected on the debris of a temple. I went on writing to several English dailies in those days about the finding. Only one news paper published my view and that too in the letters to Editor column.

In the backdrop of ASI report, that Ram Mandir was grazed down only to construct Babri Masjid, I support and am of the view, Ram Mandir be built on the same very place, where temple was demolished by invader and subsequent Islamist ruler; even while certainly not of the view, that demolition of the Masjid was the ONLY alternative. The case is not as much of faith, as much it is of legal title and facts; Ram lalla (Shri Ram) is found to be legal heir of the Ayodhya land, through documentation and also ASI reports mentions, Temple remains and pillars were found beneath Babri masjid, which only suggests, there was a Temple, which was demolished to build a Masjid illegally.  I look forward to early Court verdict keeping in view of Allahabad Judgment based of factual ASI reports; and that’s justice is not held hostage to minority appeasement, with this I also assert, as a Hindu and also Indian, we shall accept the judgment delivered by highest court of the country (after utilizing all the opportunity at the disposal). Also, as conciliatory gesture, a structure bearing name Babri Masjid can/should be allowed at some distance away from Ayodhya, the Ram Janmabhoomi.

Only if  polity earlier (and even now), would have stood behind what is right and facts presented, and requested for quick delivery justice, may be Babri Demolition (illegally) wouldnt have happened, and legal solution for creation of Ram Mandir could have been sought; also unfortunate riots killing many people would also have been avoided. Anyways, its late; but I still hope course correction happens soon. Also, The possibility of riots by miscreants, should also not deter away from delivering justice based on facts, anyone indulging in riots be punished, without discrimination.

Demand for Ram Mandir also has its bearing, for being Ancient Indian Cultural Heritage. The decline of society in its value and also in its existence happens, when the history is insulted and not preserved;  Whatever be the faith; FACTS cant be ignored, and Fact remains, there was a Temple which was broken down; thus it has to be restored; and also semtiments of minority can be respected by not robbing away the structure of Babri Masjid, just at some distance, which is also suggested by Allahbad High court in its judgment.

Is the situation in India not conducive for differently-abled people?

Category : Uncategorized

Recently, a news report said that a differently abled person complained of being embarrassed by airport authorities when she was forced to take off her prosthetic leg and pass it through the luggage scanner along with other passengers’ baggage. She claimed that the incident “brought her to tears”. This sparked off a debate whether Indian society and infrastructure provides a conducive environment for the differently-abled.

 

While my issue is less with the individual, who felt offended or awkward (though personally i dont see a reason, but than each to his/her own). My Major problem is with Media, who make hue and cry, by loathing around make victimhood environment steamed in negativity with hollow sympathy for differently abled.

In this context, I spoke with OpIndia.com, and here is my interview

 

Q. How difficult has it been for you, being a differently-abled person?

Jaymin: Well, being differently abled since birth actually worked in my favour. Many times after lateral accidents or mishaps one has to unlearn so much and relearn to adapt and adjust, in that scenario, you can say, from birth I was given my scope area which I had to adjust and expertise to deliver.

Q. So how was your childhood and even otherwise, did you face any embarrassing or uncomfortable moment?

I would say, everyone would have faced embarrassing or rude behavior in one’s life, similarly I too have faced, when I required genuine help but was turned down or kind of mocked at. However, the positive and compassionate support is so huge since my childhood from my parents to friends to acquaintances and most strangers, these embarrassing moments don’t matter. All because of motivation, especially from my mother and then in school from my principal and then from all friends from very early stage, never made me feel awkward to request help. From cabbies to policemen to even stray strangers, have always been supportive and provided support, whenever I needed, without trampling my dignity.

 

To read more – kindly click here